<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digital Inclusion Unconference &#8211; defining digital inclusion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wesharestuff.org/blog/2010/01/28/digital-inclusion-unconference-defining-digital-inclusion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wesharestuff.org/blog/2010/01/28/digital-inclusion-unconference-defining-digital-inclusion/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Jun 2010 21:05:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sporter</title>
		<link>http://wesharestuff.org/blog/2010/01/28/digital-inclusion-unconference-defining-digital-inclusion/comment-page-1/#comment-557</link>
		<dc:creator>Sporter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 May 2010 18:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wesharestuff.org/?p=534#comment-557</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;[...] Digital Inclusion Unconference &#8211; defining digital inclusion &#124; We Share Stuff &#8211; I was surprised that we were all pretty much agreed on what we meant by &#8220;digital inclusion&#8221; &#8212; that it was (and this is my wording, worked out now): [...]&lt;/i&gt;
+1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>[...] Digital Inclusion Unconference &ndash; defining digital inclusion | We Share Stuff &#8211; I was surprised that we were all pretty much agreed on what we meant by &ldquo;digital inclusion&rdquo; &mdash; that it was (and this is my wording, worked out now): [...]</i><br />
+1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interesting elsewhere &#8211; 16 February 2010 &#124; Public Strategist</title>
		<link>http://wesharestuff.org/blog/2010/01/28/digital-inclusion-unconference-defining-digital-inclusion/comment-page-1/#comment-540</link>
		<dc:creator>Interesting elsewhere &#8211; 16 February 2010 &#124; Public Strategist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:40:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wesharestuff.org/?p=534#comment-540</guid>
		<description>[...] Digital Inclusion Unconference – defining digital inclusion &#124; We Share Stuff [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Digital Inclusion Unconference – defining digital inclusion | We Share Stuff [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuff I&#8217;ve seen February 7th through to February 12th &#124; Podnosh</title>
		<link>http://wesharestuff.org/blog/2010/01/28/digital-inclusion-unconference-defining-digital-inclusion/comment-page-1/#comment-539</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuff I&#8217;ve seen February 7th through to February 12th &#124; Podnosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 00:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wesharestuff.org/?p=534#comment-539</guid>
		<description>[...] Digital Inclusion Unconference &#8211; defining digital inclusion &#124; We Share Stuff &#8211; I was surprised that we were all pretty much agreed on what we meant by &#8220;digital inclusion&#8221; &#8212; that it was (and this is my wording, worked out now): [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Digital Inclusion Unconference &ndash; defining digital inclusion | We Share Stuff &#8211; I was surprised that we were all pretty much agreed on what we meant by &ldquo;digital inclusion&rdquo; &mdash; that it was (and this is my wording, worked out now): [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bookmarks for February 9th through February 11th &#124; Birmingham Conservation Trust</title>
		<link>http://wesharestuff.org/blog/2010/01/28/digital-inclusion-unconference-defining-digital-inclusion/comment-page-1/#comment-538</link>
		<dc:creator>Bookmarks for February 9th through February 11th &#124; Birmingham Conservation Trust</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 14:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wesharestuff.org/?p=534#comment-538</guid>
		<description>[...] Digital Inclusion Unconference &#8211; defining digital inclusion &#124; We Share Stuff &#8211; I was surprised that we were all pretty much agreed on what we meant by &#8220;digital inclusion&#8221; &#8212; that it was (and this is my wording, worked out now): [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Digital Inclusion Unconference &ndash; defining digital inclusion | We Share Stuff &#8211; I was surprised that we were all pretty much agreed on what we meant by &ldquo;digital inclusion&rdquo; &mdash; that it was (and this is my wording, worked out now): [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
